Tag: intimidate

  • Empowered Women Can Negotiate and Succeed With Bad Faith Actors

    Empowered Women Can Negotiate and Succeed With Bad Faith Actors

    We like to think of negotiating as two sides coming together, sharing ideas and compromising on their interests in order to achieve a larger common objective.  That is how negotiations work in an ideal world.

    However, all too often we wind up in negotiations where one or both sides don’t want to negotiate in good faith – they refuse to subjugate their personal interests to the common objective. 

    They want to win.

    They want the other side to lose. 

    Compromise is not acceptable.

    Two gladiators fighting

    Working in the construction industry I dealt with many of these bad faith negotiations where intimidation and threats were common tools. Negotiations worked on the belief that the strongest and most powerful will prevail and win. Negotiations were little more than a contest of wills, testing who was weaker and give in first.

    Most people hate these types of negotiations. We don’t like the ugliness that goes along with them. So, when we face bad faith negotiations most of us (both men and women) make a critical mistake:

    We believe that if we are nice, if we act in good faith, if we concede something first then, they will realize we are good people who they can trust and work with.  We believe our goodness will cause them to have a change of heart.

    In our optimism and naivety, we believe we have the power to make goodwill blossom all over so we can negotiate among the sunshine, flowers and rainbows.

    Rainbow with flowers and singing bird

    But it doesn’t happen.

    Instead ,they hit us with a sledgehammer and then run over us with a truck.

    Undeterred, we stick to our values.

    We continue to tell ourselves that if we continue to be nice, we have the power to win them over.

    But then our good faith efforts are rewarded with an even larger hammer getting dropped on us and an even larger truck running us over.

    We may try again.  We may try again several times.  But eventually we get the message that the other side’s top objective is for us to lose. 

    So, how do we negotiate towards a common objective when we are faced with bad faith actors?

    The traditional response is for each side to aggressively attack each other. We get as ugly as we can be in order to intimidate the other side into backing down and conceding.  However, this seldom works. It usually results in each side just getting more entrenched in their position.  

    In more strategic workplaces there is a different tactic.

    Instead of being more confrontational and taking steps forward to get in each other’s face, we deliberately take steps back.

    We engage in a dangerous game of trying to back up them up so they step backwards off their cliff first.  In other words, we want them to make so many mistakes that they take themselves out.

    Hazard sign with person falling off a cliff

    When we take a step backwards and claim our power, we send a message that they don’t intimidate us. We don’t have to be aggressive and confrontational because we are confident in our position. We create the perception that we are using our territory and taking everything that is rightfully ours. And we will NOT give it up. 

    In response the other side takes a step backwards too. They have to claim their territory too and prove how confident and powerful they are. 

    But are they?

    Do they really know what is rightfully theirs and the limitations of their power? Or are they going to make false claims – claims they can’t deliver or prove. Claims that prove their incompetence and lack of credibility.

    When we assert everything that is rightfully ours, our strategy is to force them to also assert themselves. However, they are still playing the domination and intimidation game. So, in their haste to prove they are more powerful than us, they eventually respond with false claims.

    We then calmly discredit their claims, “Sorry, you can’t do that. Sorry, that’s not true.”

    We prove we aren’t intimidated.

    Because people hate to lose, they then make more false claims and take actions they expect to intimidate us. They believe they are expanding their territory and proving their power. However, if we know those claims are false, they discredit themselves. We have successfully backed them up onto unstable ground and eventually they fall.

    Unstable dirt along at the edge of a short cliff

    It requires, putting away our ego and defensiveness so we play strategically.  We must know our industry and profession inside out, backwards and forwards. We must know and be honest about our capabilities and our limitations. In my industry, I also had to know my legal and contractual obligations that gave me both power and restrictions.

    To succeed, we must play cooly and confidently. We must engage intellectually, not emotionally.

    The biggest mistake people make is that they revert back to emotions. Some go back to being aggressive and trying to intimidate, going for the win. However, playing into this emotion causes us to do something stupid and shoot ourselves in the foot. (We want to make our opposition to do that to themselves.)

    Other people revert back to being nice. They value “being liked, being respected, making friends and being seen as fair and compassionate,” above all else. They tell themselves this is the best long-term strategy that will pay off in future negotiations.

    WRONG!!!

    It actually sends a clear message that you are a weenie who is afraid to assert yourself. It reveals your vulnerability.

    Too often people are afraid to assert their full power and leverage because they’re afraid of how the other side will respond. They don’t understand that the other side already knows what power you have and if they see that you’re afraid to use it, they know you are a weenie. And they will take full advantage of.

    They will take advantage of that today and in every future negotiation.

    This quote from Marianne Willamson says a lot about us:

    “Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that frightens us.”

    So, we concede nothing. We give up nothing. We stand up for ourselves and refuse to back down. (I can imagine how many people are cringing at this thought. How many people, especially women, are afraid of doing this.)

    And that is why it is so effective. Anyone who is willing to project their full strength and power is INTIMIDATING! It’s what makes the other side respond foolishly and take themselves out.

    When the other side sees themselves losing, they may go for the stalemate.  They back off and lull us into thinking we won. But nothing is resolved. There is no guarantee they will now negotiate in good faith.  They could just be buying time until they have the opportunity to strike again.

    In my industry stalemates were very common but never a good thing. Since nothing was fully resolved, tensions kept boiling under the surface. When either side believed they could assert an advantage they took it and conflict erupted all over again. This lack of resolution ultimately resulted in a lose-lose scenario.

    This is why we can never be afraid to play hardball and go for a final resolution or what we think of as “the win.”  In order to get the outcome, we want we must become skilled players who force the other side to acquiesce. We must force them to accept there will be no win-lose scenario in which they are the winner. 

    In order to turn bad faith, into good faith, we must be gracious and generous in our victory. We must grant a win-win solution.

    When the other side knows they are going to lose, their priorities change. Their biggest priority isn’t making us lose – it’s protecting themselves. They want to save face and not look like a bunch of weeny losers.

    Their change in priorities makes them very willing to accept a win-win solution. Amazingly, these solutions are easy to derive once everyone stops trying to intimidate and prove their power. Win-win solutions just require everyone to accept the realities of the situation (not bravado) and to do their job.

    Understandably, many women don’t like engaging in these bad faith negotiations because of all of the macho bravado and posturing that accompanies it.  I know that because I am a woman, the first tactic men used on me was intimidation.

    However, my reaction was to roll my eyes and think, “Really??”

    Who says that just because he is a man and I am a woman, I have to be intimidated?

    What is there about him that is supposed to intimidate me?

    I never figured that out.

    A woman stands in thought, surrounded by large chalkboard with several question marks. Each question represents the uncertainties we face.

    Many men used intimidation because they assumed that I was the “token woman hire” who didn’t know my job. They assumed they could roll right over me with a bunch of BS. But not so fast guys. I know my job and profession extremely well. Much better than most men.

    Over the years I learned that women are far better at knowing details. Therefore, we’re really good at detecting men’s BS. This gives us leverage…and power. We’re the ones who can force negotiations to be based on facts, not intimidation. We’re the ones who actually discover the full strength and power of our side.

    I learned that men’s weakness in providing and working through details is what led to all the bravado and intimidation tactics. So, when the bravado started on the other side, I knew they were losing. To be a powerful negotiator, I just had to stick to the strategy. And yes, there was a lot of satisfaction in being the “toughest” person in a room full of men.

    While negotiating through intimidation is still very popular, in the early 2000’s some men came up with a new negotiation strategy.

    Instead of going all macho-bravado against macho-bravado, one side changed out a team member. They brought in a man who could nitpick really well (for a man).

    Now, men have always dealt with nitpicky men and know how to intimidate them and blow them off. So, this new man wasn’t one of those. This man applied a new tactic:

    An elderly woman with a stern expression gestures emphatically, likely expressing her disapproval with a sense of authority. Her floral-patterned shirt adds a touch of vibrancy to the serious tone of the moment, highlighting both wisdom and determination.
    www.123rf.com – 37345269

    Yup.

    The first time I saw it used, I was stunned.

    I was also stunned by how incredibly effective it was at neutralizing the machismo in the room.  (And yes, I chuckled.) But I was also a little freaked out by the inner depths of the male psyche that was revealed to me.  Were men really that intimidated by bitchiness and nagging?

    At first, I thought this tactic was unique to one particular situation.  But then I encountered it again.  And again, in different workplaces.  It had become common place.

    Admittedly, I found this tactic humorous until it was used against me.

    Yes, men (note the plural) played bitchy, nagging wife against me.

    Really???

    No.

    Sorry guys, that will NEVER work against me!

    They caught on.  So, they changed tactics again and went all macho.

    After I stopped laughing my response was: “No guys.  After you’ve gone all bitchy-woman, you can’t pull off being a macho-man. It just doesn’t work.”

    When they realized none of their tactics were working against me, I was labeled “infuriating.”  Personally, I loved being called “infuriating” because it meant we were now playing by my rules.

    Cartoon picture of a frustrated man grabbing the hair on top of his head, closed eyes and gritting teeth.

    Playing by my rules, intimidation and BS claims have no effect.  I don’t react to it. I stay put and send a very clear message “That doesn’t work against me.”

    My second rule was to deal only with facts.  No game playing.

    In life there are facts and realities that are fixed.  They can be laws of nature, industry requirements, contract terms, laws or even basic math: 2 + 2 = 4.

    Bravado does not change facts.  All the bravado in the world doesn’t make 2 + 2 = 8, even though men will try their best to convince us it does.

    In negotiating it is important to find and put all the facts out on the table.  When the BS is discarded and we deal only in facts, then the number of negotiable items is significantly reduced. 

    large stack of papers

    As I said, women are extremely good at facts and details.  This is where we find our leverage in negotiations. We can overload the other side with the inarguable facts that cement our territory. 

    My bad faith actors also knew this tactic. So, they had their bitchy-man write a very lengthy letter or email making all kinds of claims. It was very effective against my male colleagues. They only made it part way through before they were overwhelmed and lost it using a lot of colorful graphic language.

    But not me. (No bitchy-man was going to out-woman me. I was ready to play.)

    Remember that episode from season 4 of Friends where Ross and Rachel decide to get back together after “taking a break”? Rachel has one condition.

    Ross finally comes clean and admits that he fell asleep reading the letter – it was 18 pages long – front and back!

    Rachel’s letter is a pure female masterpiece. It’s what the bitchy-man tries to replicate.

    During my career I write countless “Rachel Letters” and relished every opportunity to dive into the deepest depths of my femininity and turn male bravado BS into stuttering, stammering blather.  It is so empowering!

    We know they will get ugly and try to intimidate us because they believe we are afraid of conflict. They believe we only want sunshine and roses. They don’t realize the power of our sunshine and light.

    Unfortunately, too many of us have been conditioned to fear conflict and give intimidation and bravado more power than it deserves. We were never taught about our own feminine power and how to use it to get the good outcome we want.

    As women, we are NOT required to negotiate by men’s rules which set us up to lose. We can use strategies that rely on our feminine strengths to counter male tactics and gain the upper hand.

    As women who want the win-win scenario and to create a workplace full of sunshine and roses, we can’t be afraid to get our hands dirty. We must remember that to plant the flowers, we must dig in the dirt and get our hands dirty.

    Empowered Women Aren’t Intimidated By Anyone Who Acts In Bad Faith

    I’ve thought about this blog many times during President Trump’s tenure. While I’ve never read “Art of the Deal,” I suspect Trump uses a similar strategy to one I talk about in the first half of this blog.

    He absolutely is NOT afraid to use the full power of the United States economically or militarily. And he certainly seems to be overly friendly to “enemies” at the end of a conflict.

    It’s interesting to watch all the responses, especially from media.

    There are many people who believe he is all about aggression because that is the only strategy they know. It aligns with a narrative they promote.

    There are many people who believe we diplomacy has more power than it has. They say we should always be nice and value friendships and alliances above all else. They want to believe everyone in the world wants sunshine and roses and the only reason anyone is aggressive is because we were aggressive first.

    This attitude ensures you will be taken advantage of.

    A lot of people also don’t want to believe there are ‘bad faith actors” in the world because well, they are afraid to deal with them. It’s easier to ignore them and forever kick the can down the road hoping some event will magically change who they are, just like the singing in Whoville changed the Grinch.

    Recently saw a sign that said:

    Sign saying 'Lover your neighbor, no exceptions>"

    My immediate reaction was, “What do you do when your neighbor is throwing stones at you and doesn’t stop????”

    We must remember that this is the real world and “bad faith actors” exist and need someone to stand up to them.

    The bottom line is, that when we are faced with “bad faith actors,” we need to wisely use whatever power we have to stop them. That is the only way we can possibly change them.

  • Have the Right Attitude to Stand Up for Yourself

    When women experience inappropriate behavior, sexual harassment, bullying or discrimination in the workplace, we have a lot of reactions – shock, anger, resentment, fear.  Our mix of emotions creates confusion as we try to figure out what we should do about it.

    We want to hit the right and appropriate response but we aren’t always sure what it is.  We don’t want to come off as a trouble-maker by blowing the incident out of proportion.  But we also don’t want to downplay the incident and feel like we let ourselves be diminished.  All we really want is stand up for ourselves and be treated with respect for doing so. 

    I found that finding the right response begins with having the right attitude.  The right attitude says that no one has the right to diminish anyone else.  This attitude also infers that no one is superior to or better than anyone else.  Being higher in the organizational structure, having more education, more job experience, more authority or more anything doesn’t make a difference.   As human beings we are all equal and deserve to be treated as such.

    When you apply this attitude you come to terms with how diminished the incident really made you feel.  Too often women are taught to go right into victimization, no matter who the man is or what the comment or behavior was.  However I don’t like victimization because it automatically assumes the offender has power over you and the ability to diminish you.   It assumes a natural or inherent inequality.

    The right attitude however makes you ask one simple question:  Who is this guy that he thinks he has the right to diminish me?

    That is an empowering question.   It makes you think about why you elevated this guy’s opinion and subjugated yourself to it.  Why does his opinion matter to you?

    It reminds you that no matter who he is, or thinks he is, he still puts on his pants one leg at a time.  Therefore, he is just an ordinary human being and not part of a superior alien species.  He may have more power and authority in our workplace but again that doesn’t give him the right to diminish others.  It simply means he has a different role and responsibilities.  And his responsibilities often dictate that he ensures everyone be treated fairly and equally.

    When you recognize your inherent equality, your perspective changes and a new question quickly comes to my mind: What the heck is wrong with this guy?

    This question helps you recognize that the incident says nothing about you and only makes a statement about your offender.  It allows you to refocus on your offender and why he acted the way he did.

    Armed with the right attitude, we can then come up with effective, empowering and appropriate responses to incidents.  Personally, I divide incidents and my response into three categories based upon the severity of the incident.   In the first two categories, the offender doesn’t have or isn’t using his organizational power to impact to you.  This makes it easier to see him simply as a jerk and the incident as representing that something is off with him.

    My first response category is the Eye Rolling Response.  These incidents are very minor and not worthy of any concerted response on your part.  The eye rolling, smirk or “what is wrong with you” expression conveys the message that you aren’t impacted, diminished or subjugated.  It is the “I’m rubber, you’re glue, what you say bounces off of me and sticks to you” response.

    You want to be careful not to over-respond to these incidents because your offender can be feeling you out, interpret your over-reaction as a sign of weakness and continue to target you.

    My second response category is where most incidents fall.  You want to stand up for yourself and make a point but, you are afraid it will be blown out of proportion and backfire on you.  All too often we let these offenses go without a response.  Then we feel bad about that too.  We feel trapped in a no-win scenario.

    When you think about what you really want, you realize you want culture change.  You want your response to help the offender(s) to grow out of their behavior.

    The reason we struggle with this category so much is because we’ve been taught to be limited in our responses.  We are taught the only acceptable response is to file a complaint and take the issue to management to resolve.  But there are two problems with this.

     

    The first is that when we take the problem to HR or management we feel like we are acknowledging being diminished, and that we aren’t capable of standing up for ourselves.  It is disempowering.  It doesn’t make us feel strong or equal.

     

     

    The second problem is that the offender will be blamed then possibly punished.  In either case he will see himself as being diminished.  He will want to restore his equality and respect.  And that means you probably just made an enemy in your workplace.

     

    The problem with the standard file a complaint response to these types of incidents is that the solution usually raises one person up and diminishes the other.  It doesn’t maintain the equality and the balance of personal power.  It is further complicated by the fact that men and women perceive the situation from two very different perspectives.

     

    Women are fighting for their respect and self-esteem.  We assume men are too but they aren’t.

    Once men are diminished they see themselves as fighting for survival.  At this level they fight back more fiercely than women who see this situation from their perspective think is warranted.   This leads women to conclude that men are fighting back because they believe in the subjugation of women.  So women then fight back harder.

    This misunderstanding of perceptions throws the situation way out of wack.  Each party feels diminished and blames the other without understanding the other party feels diminished too.  The conflict goes round and round with no happy kumbaya ending.  It teaches all us that standing up for yourself just creates a bigger mess and isn’t worth it.

    This is why in this category we need to think beyond the file a complaint response and be more creative.

    Over the years I’ve written several articles about being creative and the effectiveness of using humor to stand up for yourself, address an incident and create culture change.  Contrary to what we are taught, humor doesn’t diminish the seriousness of our response or suggest we are merely laughing it off.  Instead humor creates a positive environment where no one is diminished so the offender can grow and change their attitude without blame or shame.  (super-important to men)

    Creative and humorous responses demonstrate that you are equal, strong and confident without conflict.  This earns you the respect you wanted all along.

    My third category of responses is for the really egregious and ugly stuff.  It is where I make a firm stand and take formal action because the offender’s comment, action or behavior successfully impacts me and I can’t stop it.  The impact can be:

    • Monetary affecting my role, promotion, raise, bonus or lay off.
    • Invasive physical contact
    • Unwanted attention from a Creeper so I longer feel comfortable or safe in the workplace and/or away from it.
    • Bullying

    Out of all of these issues, the monetary ones are actually the easiest and most clear cut to resolve.  However they are often an indicator of a larger culture that will tolerate the other issues.

    So, whenever you face incidents in this category take a good look around your workplace.  You will probably discover that you are not alone in your situation.  This includes your male colleagues who often silently endure degrading behavior.

    In this category the offender is more emboldened.  He’s gotten away with his actions before and that made him feel powerful.  He began spinning a flywheel and created a cycle where he abused and intimidated people to make himself feel more powerful.  As he abused more people his flywheel spun faster, produced more energy and making him seem invincible.  Consequently, no one stood up to him.  It is an intimidating one-on-one situation that makes many of us back down and then feel guilty about it.   We know the offender is counting on us backing down just like everyone else did and this makes us angry.  We want to stand up for ourselves.  We want what’s right.

    Again this is where your attitude reminds you that he is just a man who created an image and you aren’t totally powerless against him.  This fact gives you the determination to stand up for what is right and see it through to the end.

    It also forces you into a reality check and recognize that dismantling his intimidating flywheel may take time – there may not be that satisfying swift and dramatic victory.  So, check your attitude – are you really trying to diminish and punish him?  Or, are you trying to neutralize him, hold him accountable and get justice?  There is a big difference between the two and only the latter will be successful.

    When you are dealing with an offender especially those with a long list of victims you are not engaging in a battle of wills or power.  You are engaging in a battle of flywheels.  Therefore, your objective is to put a new flywheel into motion that counters his.  You take a stand in order to create momentum against the offender that allows just a few more people come forward.  They then increase the momentum of your flywheel.  As word spreads, more people come forward and your flywheel is further energized.  Your offender becomes less intimidating and his flywheel loses momentum.  Eventually the offender is neutralized by the momentum of the forces against him.

    It is a scary to be the first person to take a stand and be the one who starts the second flywheel into motion.  But if you really believe that all people are equal and no one has the right to diminish anyone else, then you have a duty to stand up.  And remember you won’t be in this alone – you will recruit others to increase the momentum of your flywheel.

    I’ve found that finding other people to join you is easier when they know you are committed and will not back down.  I then present them with a binary choice:  Do they want to be on the side that stands up for what is right?  Or, do they want to be on the side that supports this bad behavior?

    I keep their decision black and white.  They can choose to go on the record as a good guy or a bad guy.

    Most people want to be the good guys and want to do what is right.

    Your “good guys” help recruit the other “good guys” they know and trust.   Together you increase the momentum of our flywheel and spread its influence across the workplace.  Sometimes you will be fortunate and the right good guys get on board and immediately stop the behavior.  Sometimes it takes a while.  In these cases, I find that there is an irony.  The  offender keeps up his behavior to energize his  flywheel but in reality he is adding momentum to my flywheel.  In the end he destroys himself – and I never had to go negative or get ugly.  I just had to stand up for what is right.

    I lost count of how many times I’ve successfully put the second flywheel into motion on behalf of myself or others.  While it is scary to do the first couple of times, you realize that when we exercise our inherent equality we can restore power and respect to everyone.  This energizes a new flywheel within yourself that strengthens your attitude that no one has the right to diminish anyone else.  The next time you have the opportunity to take a stand, you do so but with even more confidence.

     

    Empowered Women Have the Right Attitude to Stand Up For What is Right

     

     

    For more articles on harassment and discrimination go to  The Ugly Stuff article category

    Empower Yourself  – Subscribe to my articles – Contact Me

    Assert and Express Yourself – Leave a Comment & Share this article

    Follow The Woman In The Room on Facebook for more empowering ideas and solutions!