Tag: team

  • The Reality of Being a Change Agent

    Recently I read an article about how to be an effective Change Agent.  The article listed the characteristics of a Change Agent as Positive, Visionary, Likeable, Open and Strategic.  It is through these qualities that the Change Agent has the ability to alter the deeply held beliefs of others simply by being authentic.

    http://www.123rf.com/24692596

    Whoa.

    The person who wrote this has never been a Change Agent!

    I hate to burst anyone’s bubble but being positive, open, likeable or even collaborative isn’t enough to alter deeply held beliefs.  These positive characteristics aren’t a magic wand or magic fairy dust that makes Change easy.  Sorry.  That’s not how it works.

    I’ve been a Change Agent in all of my workplaces and learned that the most important quality of a Change Agent is the ability to deal with Conflict.  If you can’t deal with Conflict, then you can’t make Change happen.

    When we create a Change, we are asking our team to go beyond their current comfort zone.  Each team member has their own personal response.  For some the Change is non-threatening.  Others will be reluctant.  Using the positive qualities mentioned above helps get most people on board.

    But not everyone.  In most organizations there is one hold out.

    You know who I am talking about.

    This is the person who only wants to do things their way.  They have a history of resisting and derailing any attempt to Change the status quo.  The team, having been through this before, knows that unless this person buys-in. the Change won’t happen.  So they take a wait-and-see attitude.  They want to see how you, the Change Agent is going to deal with the Difficult Person.

    The Difficult Person resists Change as if their life depended on it.  Change threatens how they perceive themselves.  We all want to think that we are doing things right and working as hard as we can.   But, to a Difficult Person Change is like a megaphone publicly announcing: “You’ve been doing it WRONG!  You don’t know how to do your job because you are incompetent.”

    Change triggers something from their past that causes their response.  They see themselves losing status and fight back the way they were unable to do in their past.

    Being good people, we recognize they feel threatened and immediately try to ease their concerns.  We try to be nice, get to know them, be their friend, talk to them, hear them out etc. etc.  But none of this works.  Their negativity continues.  We become worn down and exhausted.  We are too drained to push forward with the Change and give up.

    Change is just too hard.

    The Difficult Person got exactly what they wanted.

    The rest of the team is discouraged.  They feel trapped and held hostage by the Difficult Person.  They view management as weak because they can’t deal with the Difficult Person.

    How do we create Change when there is a Difficult Person?

    First as the Change Agent you have to get your head screwed on straight.  You must accept that you aren’t a psychologist and aren’t paid to be one.  It isn’t your job to resolve the Difficult Person’s personal issues.  Your job is, to implement Changes, that improve your organization’ performance.

    Your colleagues are also responsible to implement Changes that improve the organization’s performance.  No one has the right to place their personal issues above organizational performance.  Each team member can either go along with the Change or face the consequences or find employment elsewhere.  It is their choice.

    Sound cold?

    Think of it this way:  Is it fair to everyone else to be held hostage by the Difficult Person’s issues?  Should their livelihood or family suffer because we want to be nice to the Difficult Person who has already demonstrated that they don’t care about the rest of the team?

    The Difficult Person isn’t interested in creating a win-win scenario.  They want a win-lose scenario where they are the victor.

    This creates the conflict the Change Agent must overcome.  Therefore Change requires a strategy.

    I take a positive approach.  I don’t dictate changes.  Instead I present a proposed Change as a workplace problem that we need to solve as a team.  I schedule a meeting where we can all sit down and work on the problem together.  Since most people in my organizations hate meetings but like free food, I have these meetings over lunch.  People bond when they share a meal so this increases the positive atmosphere.

    Most changes in the workplace are procedural – how to accomplish something.  This requires mapping out the new procedure.  My job is to act as the facilitator and let my team figure out the best procedure.  I stand at the white board to write out the procedure and ask simple questions such as:

    • What’s next?”
    • “Who does that?”
    • “Why?”
    • “When does that need to happen?”
    • “What about…”
    • “What else is there?”

     

    When we are done, the Change is mapped out and the team has buy-in.

    Except for the Difficult Person.  They had a last minute crisis so they couldn’t attend the meeting.

    http://www.123rf.com/ 36332388

    If you doubt that you have a Difficult Person amongst your team, hold the meeting and see who has the last minute crisis.  They will make it sound legitimate but it was contrived in order to avoid Change.

    Because I have dealt with so many difficult people, I am no longer amazed by the lengths they will go to avoid the meeting.  I personally tell them face to face about the meeting.  I personally remind them multiple times by email and in person about the meeting.  I deny them the ability to use the “I didn’t know about the meeting” or the infamous “I forgot” excuse.

    With experience I got good at anticipating their next excuse so I block it.  Yes it is a game.  They try to get out of the meeting and I block their attempt.  As the Change Agent, my job is to force them to be very creative in their excuses.

    When a Difficult Person has no way out, then what typically happens is they become sick.  Genuinely sick.  My best explanation is that they are coming face-to-face with their own issues.

    When this happens it is important to once again to have your head screwed on straight.

    You have to remember you are engaged a win-lose scenario.  Not with the Difficult Person, but with their personal issues.

    I recognize that the Difficult Person is also held hostage by their issues.  Their issues are stronger than them, their colleagues and their managers.  Their issues always win.  The Difficult Person needs to know someone is stronger than their issues by not giving in.

    That is the real Conflict a Change Agent takes on.

    On the day I put the Change into effect I clear my calendar to deal with nothing else.  I know this is the day when the Difficult Person will make their last ditch effort to stop the Change.  As the Change Agent it is my responsibility to handle the grenades the Difficult Person launches.  It is my responsibility to work with my team to make sure the Change happens.

    Standing up to the Difficult Person’s issues simply requires calling upon my super-stubborn inner 3 year old child who only knows the word “No.”

    I’m not aggressive.  I just refuse to budge.  The Change is going to happen.  It doesn’t matter what the Difficult Person says, how many threats they make or how they try to intimidate me, the Change is going to happen.

    It doesn’t matter how many alternative ways they come up with, the answer is “No.”  I am not budging.  The change is going to happen the way the team worked it out.

    I know from personal experience how far a Difficult Person will go to convince you that your proposed Change will have cataclysmic consequences.  They will do their best to make you question yourself and feel incompetent.  (How they are feeling inside.)  But you have to remember, that the Change wasn’t 100% your idea.  It was a collaborative effort, using the collective knowledge and experience of the team.

    The team knows what they are doing.  If any problems arise the team will figure it out.  The team wants to move forward.  And as the Change Agent your responsibility is to the team.

    How does this all play out in the end?

    Sometimes the Difficult Person breaks and suddenly everything is sunshine and roses.  The Difficult Person becomes a great team player.  It truly is magical.

    Sometime the Difficult Person quits and finds a job elsewhere.

    Sometimes you have to take disciplinary action and fire the Difficult Person.

    And sometimes, senior management steps in and sides with the Difficult Person.  The changes never happen and the organization never moves forward.  The workplace becomes deeply dysfunctional and you leave to find a job elsewhere where your Change Agent skills can make a real difference.

    However it turns out, you know you have what it takes to make your organization better.  And it feels really good to know you CAN make a difference!

     

    Empowered Women Aren’t Afraid To Be Change Agents

    To subscribe to my articles Contact Me

    Follow The Woman In The Room on Facebook

  • What Men and Women Can Teach Each Other About Teamwork

    Last week I heard a woman say (paraphrasing) “Women should stop using teamwork as something they are better at than men.  Men play sports and use teamwork more so they are better at teamwork than women.” 41327855_m (1)

    My problem with this statement is that understanding teamwork through sports gives us a limited perspective of teamwork.  Teamwork has many deeper, richer and more powerful applications.  We have to understand how women use teamwork to fully appreciate the true power of teamwork.

    We understand that teamwork is the cooperative and coordinated effort of a group of people acting together in a common cause.  Each person on a team has a function and their actions have to be harmonious with all of the actions of all of the other team members.

    When teamwork is used in sports, the common cause is to defeat the other team and win.  Sports tie teamwork to competition and winning.

    In order for the team to win, it needs the best players.  That drives the team to look for A players.  Realistically, it is difficult to have a team comprised of only A players.  Most teams have a few A players, a lot of B players and few C.  To make up for the shortcomings of the B and C players, the team needs an MVP, a player whose skills are superior.  We learned this in elementary school when broke into teams at recess.  Each team captain wanted to choose first so they could get the MVP on their team.  In my school it was Randy Curly.  Every time it was Randy’s turn to kick in our game of kickball, he kicked a homerun.  Randy and MVP’s secure the win.

    But when we rely on individual stand out performances and MVP’s are we really promoting teamwork and working together?  Or are most team members just fillers used to showcase the MVP?

    When individual team members are allowed to stand out from other team members, it invites competition amongst team members.  There can be ball hogging.  The objective of working together to achieve something great can be lost to individual ego and personal glory.

    Since competition can degrade teamwork, sports don’t always give us the best representation of teamwork.

    Women use teamwork to enable many individuals to function as one entity.  When women work together there is a high level of synergy and intuitive action.  Women are continuously aware of what other team members are doing and when they see another team member needing help, they step in and give that help.  The team continuously rebalances workloads so they all finish at about the same time.

    I am sure there are a lot of women who disagree and are saying “Women don’t work that way!”

    And they are right because women have been taught to emulate men.  They have been taught to replace their natural teamwork with competition.  They were taught they need stand out performances and to be MVP’s in order to compete with their male colleagues.  And when women go into a workplace feeling like the underdog, then their sense of competition is heightened and teamwork suffers.

    There are also many women like me who work with men and don’t get to practice our natural female teamwork skills.  I try using my collaboration and synergy skills with men but it was like playing catch where I throw the ball and no one throws it back.  It wasn’t until I started supervising women and participating in women’s circles that I got to reconnect with my feminine teamwork skills.

    For me the difference between how men and women approach teamwork was driven home a few years ago when I attended a seminar.  The instructors noticed that for the first time they had enough women to form an all-female team for an exercise.  They wanted to see if there were differences between how men and women completed the task.  For the exercise we were given stacks of yellow Post-its and 25 minutes to build something.  All of the women except me were in traditional roles and worked with women.  So I felt a little out of place as they immediately started talking.  I will admit that my mind started racing through stereotypes especially when they decided to build a purse.

    Fearing too much female energy, I decided to balance it with a little male energy by driving the work and keeping us on task.  In other words, I was afraid they would talk too much and we would never get done in our 25 minutes.

    We made assignments and began.  After 5 minutes, with nonstop chatter, I noticed two women trade assignments, soon followed by the other two trading assignments.  They never discussed trading work, it just happened.  Then after 12 minutes, the two groups switched assignments with each other, again without saying a word except for the nonstop talk about shopping for purses.  Inside, I was freaking out.  Scared we would get off track I brought up how we traded assignments.  We took a minute to assess, improve the design and reassign tasks.  The talking never stopped and I learned more about purses than I ever knew.  We finished on time with a perfectly functioning handbag.  It was really cool!

    As for the men, two teams attempted a city scene.   But each team member worked independently and when they assembled their cities they wiggled like Jell-O.  It was obvious they didn’t have the synergy of women.

    The lesson I learned is that true teamwork requires a balance of male and female traits.  When both are present we can have great achievements.  Luckily for all of us, the Super Bowl is our annual national reminder of this.

    Every year in the week leading up to the Super Bowl a sports reporter asks a player who he thinks is the most important player on the team.  And every year the answer is the same – no one is the most important player on the team.  While every player is highly skilled in his position, they are not the league’s best player.  It is how they work together that makes them great.

    Last year, I heard a player explain the team’s performance by saying that they practiced and worked together so much that they got to know each other intuitively.  They learned how to play intuitively and work as one entity.  Listening to him I immediately thought – they achieved the synergy women naturally have.

    Great teamwork is achieved by blending the intuition, collaboration and synergy of women with the driving action of men.  With great teamwork, we have great achievements.

    Championship teams remind us that the greatest feelings of victory don’t come from defeating an opponent, they come from achieving more than you believed you could.

     

    Empowered Women Elevate Teamwork Above Competition

    Contact me to receive new articles

    And don’t forget to share!